| Looks like the scm configuration is whack, Continuum picks up bits like:
I've added the project, manually edited the SCM urls and asked Continuum to build them (pending a bunch of other stuff that is in the queue before them though). Looks like GBuild Agent's build might have wedged, its reporting that its been running for 1 d 15 h 43 min 6 sec, and that seems like a tad too long for a build to run.
--jason
On Jul 2, 2006, at 2:43 PM, David Blevins wrote:
-David
On Jul 2, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Can we get Ci to build and deploy artifacts from the openejb2 m2 build with these new groupId's so that the G m2 build can start using them?
--jason
On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
That's cool. That's what we're using in the 3 branch.
On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different names: otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up m1 openejb jars. I think the easiest way to do this is to give the m2 jars m2 style groupIds. To get this started I changed the m2 openejb build to use org.openejb. If this is the wrong groupId let me know what is more correct and I will change it.
thanks david jencks
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
|
- Re: [openejb-dev] openejb m2 groupId Jason Dillon
-