On Aug 16, 2006, at 8:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'm releasing out of branches/1_1_1. Is your stuff in trunk ?
No it's in a branch, so we'd have to vote it into trunk. If you were
thinking it was in branches/1.1.1, don't worry about it.
Probably best to let Jason get his spec layout change in first.
-David
David Blevins wrote:
Grrr, I'm missing mail again -- pulled it from the archives.
Thanks, Dain, for pointing out there was a message for me.
On 8/15/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David,
>
> I am releasing the specs as a 1.1.1 release due to some changes
in jacc. Do you want to include the
> changes to JPA there?
That would be great. In fact all the jee5_exp specs could be
released. The related specifications went final so we should be
good to go.
-David
On Aug 15, 2006, at 4:17 AM, David Blevins wrote:
I got OpenJPA to run with my JPA code. So we're looking real good.
On Aug 13, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
So far, it's just got a TopLink provider, but if people want to
copy
that to create providers for Cayenne or OpenJPA or whatever, that
would be great. It basically just needs to have a customized
name and
ClassPath, though I'm assuming any provider we integrate with
will be
compatible with the Geronimo JPA spec JAR (currently
org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/jar)
OpenJPA and the Geronimo JPA spec jar weren't happy. Our JPA jar
had some bad signatures and was missing a few exception classes.
I fixed those and managed to get OpenJPA to compile and run with
our JPA jar rather than the CDDL version they use.
If you try to build and run this, you'll be held up by a couple
things:
For me its:
- Still missing the some JNDI stuff Dain is working on
(mentioned earlier in the thread).
- Need the plugin goop
But when that is there, this should run for ejbs or servlets in
1.1.1 and maybe 1.1 (should work).
My goal is to have a release of this plugin with sufficient user
documentation when G 1.1.1 is released. It would be great to have
some open source JPA providers for that release too.
I also started talking to David B about the JPA work being done in
OpenEJB, and I think we're agreed that we probably don't need
two such
plugins for G 1.1.x, so hopefully we can work toward a
unification as
we move forward.
I'm sure we can figure something out. I'll give it some more
thought tomorrow, time for bed now....zzzzZZZZ
-David
