Dang it. Figures that trying to report this early means that I can't reproduce the problem again. If I'm not seeing things, then the problem figures to be timing related. I'll keep trying. I'm currently looking at a couple different issues with regards to 4.0.2 (AMQ-957 and AMQ-776) and hit this problem.
yaussy wrote: > > Sorry, should have included this important detail: > > If you start the brokers in the opposite order, everything works > correctly. I.e.: > > 1) Start broker B > 2) Start broker A > 3) start consumer C against broker A, on FOO > 4) start publisher P against broker B, on FOO > > > yaussy wrote: >> >> Thought I'd throw this out there, even though I haven't tested it >> completely. But, I just ran into a problem this morning like the >> following (using the ProducerTool and ConsumerTool from the >> distribution): >> >> 1) Start broker A (has a network connection to broker B) >> 2) Start broker B (has a network connection to broker A) >> 3) start consumer C against broker A, on FOO >> 4) start publisher P against broker B, on FOO >> >> Messages do not flow to consumer C. In the broker B log, there's no >> indication it got any subscriptions from broker A. >> >> If you need more detail, such as XML (pretty stock settings, though), let >> me know. >> >> >> Hiram Chirino wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Thanks for taking the time to check the release. Vote passes with 7 >>> +1's . We just need to get the incubator PMC to now approve the >>> release. >>> >>> +1 Votes: >>> Hiram Chirino >>> James Strachan >>> Rob Davies >>> Guillaume Nodet >>> Brian McCallister >>> Alan D. Cabrera >>> Aaron Mulder >>> >>> No +/- 0 or -1's >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Hiram >>> >>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--Release-Apache-ActiveMQ-4.0.2-%28RC-4%29-tf2370024.html#a6679337 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
