OK I will provide another patch tomorrow morning.
Thanks
Fabrice
gnodet wrote:
>
> But if we use a LinkedHashMap, the map keeps the
> order of keys as they were inserted:
> "This linked list defines the iteration ordering,
> which is normally the order in which keys were
> inserted into the map".
> So it should be safe to use this implementation.
> The map does not sort on key values like a TreeMap does.
>
> On 10/9/06, Fabrice Dewasmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> gnodet wrote:
>> >
>> > Endpoints order should be kept inside an SU.
>> > Could you raise a JIRA for that, it should be easy
>> > to fix by replacing the used map implementation by
>> > an ordered map.
>> >
>>
>> In fact, endpoints are stored in a HashMap with keys generated by
>> EndpointSupport class and which are Strings that look like :
>> {namespace}servicename:endpointname
>>
>> using an ordered map won't solve anything as you've got no indication of
>> ordering except the natural order, and I don't know if we can safely
>> prefix
>> the key string with the order number or even use an object as a key as
>> the
>> string is used to build destination for routing.
>>
>> Fabrice
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/http-endpoint-activation-ordering-tf2395343.html#a6718919
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/http-endpoint-activation-ordering-tf2395343.html#a6723223
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
