For Apache, I understand the CDDL is ok to distribute in binary form *only*.
See: http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html Joe Bohn wrote: > I mentioned in an earlier post that it appears our best option for > including JSTL 1.2 for Java EE 5 is to pick up the Glassfish JSTL > library. It is licensed under CDDL. Does anybody know of any issues or > concerns from a license perspective that would prevent us from doing this? > > AFAIK the major difference between CDDL and AL2 is that CDDL requires > that source for fixes/mods be contributed back to the originator. I > don't expect us to be making any changes to the Glassfish JSTL. If we > did find it necessary then our preference would be to get the fix > included in the source and pick up a newer release to distribute. So I > don't believe there are any issues here but if anybody else if aware of > any please speak up. > > Thanks, > Joe
