Oh, by the way, doesn't this change address the transaction isolation level problem in TranQL/OpenEJB (GERONIMO-2128)?
Thanks, Nellya Udovichenko. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 2:55 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Updates to OEJB 2.2 and TranQL 1.4 I have updated TranQL 1.4 and Open EJB 2.2 to support specification of a Select-For-Update clause in the openejb-jar.xsd when deploying CMP EJBs. I have published new SNAPSHOTs of both projects so in a perfect world there should be no pain :) I'll be stress testing DayTrader tonight to confirm that we can run an EJB workload under stress. If no changes are made then the current SQL syntax is generated and you'll notice no difference. If you want you can add a <select-for-update>true</select-for-update> element to the Entity element in your openejb-jar. I'll post some results when I finish testing. Cheers. Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
