On Nov 30, 2006, at 9:39 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:


--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thinking about this more I think we should perhaps rename the specs
configs "specs" without the j2ee-1.4 stuff in the name and start
putting the new specs into it.  I'm also starting to think that
keeping jetty5 around in 2.0 will just slow us down even if it isn't

   Just a fleeting idea.. Could we possibly use the specs-configs
approach for the new things (JEE 1.5) and use the old way of doing
things for 1.4 stuff. I know it needs more thought.... We should have
at least one web container working all the time.

I certainly agree at least one web container should always be working :-). I think jetty6 is working with new specs.... we just have to rearrange things a little bit, I think Joe is working on that.

I don't understand how we could have a hybrid approach in one branch. If we left the 1.4 spec jars in the rmi-naming config and also gave it a parent config of the combined set of new jee5 specs and unconverted j2ee 1.4 specs I think the copies from the parent config would always be used.

I suspect I'm not understanding what you are proposing :-)

thanks
david jencks


Thanks
Anita



______________________________________________________________________ ______________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index

Reply via email to