On Dec 22, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Dec 22, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
From what I understand, the problem you are focusing on
is just a naming problem: you want the GA release to be
named 2.0. That's fine. But it only concerns the final
downloadables archives, right ?
This is a good point. For the assemblies, from a "marketing"
standpoint, we can version them any way we want.
Nope, since mvn releases each component's artifact separately, its
not just the zip/tgz that one traditionally thinks of as the
release... its every single artifact that gets spit out of the
release.
We should deal with the module versions separately from the
assemblies. I'll hop back on this next week...I'm taking a few days
of R & R.
Cheers
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
