Why not just ask Prasad (or Jason w/ GBuild) to include the testsuite in the daily run that includes the unit tests -
Subject: [BUILD] TRUNK: Successful for Revision: 532672 Date: 26 Apr 2007 09:37:43 -0000 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [email protected] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenEJB trunk at 532669 Geronimo Revision: 532672 built with tests included . . .and then just pick one of those that passes every week to publish to the snapshot repo and to publish for users to download? That way, as the testsuite gains more component coverage, we'll naturally move towards a more formal test process before releases are selected to vote on.
-Donald Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Here is a question to ponder. Would anyone object if I simply made these binaries available from people as a monthly unstable release? Given the amount of time it takes to spin this up and vote I'd rather just pick an svn version and make it available. I think it burns up a lot of people's time to follow the release process. Simply pop out the binary, let people play with it and if things are broken there is always trunk. Perhaps we could move to a weekly unstable.Anyway, I'd like some thoughts on this. On Apr 26, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Starting DISCUSS thread if necessary for this release.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
