Also, you mention a CXF depend, but can your WADI changes be used if the user chooses Axis2 instead of CXF for the Jetty assembly?
-Donald Gianny Damour wrote:
On 22/06/2007, at 2:34 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:We've gone through the CTS grind and came out victorious http://java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jspOpenEJB has moved to TopLevel and CXF has certified and Axis 2 is working that way too.All in all its been an excellent six months. So, what are we going to do for 2.0 and getting it out the door?Here are my thoughts and we can use this thread to gather everyone else's and come to a consensus.2.0 Ship Criteria Date: mid to end of July (a target only...depends on content) Certified Assemblies Tomcat, Axis 2 and OpenJPA Jetty, CXF and OpenJPAOther assemblies would be the minimal assemblies but cert doesn't apply to them.Work on fit and finish stuff (cleaning up error messages, improving diagnostics, reducing footprint).Personally, I'd like to see the full G have a footprint of about 40MB (that's a little over 5MB larger than 1.1.1) and Minimal be around 20MB. Need to do some research on this (volunteers?)I'm not sure how the WADI clustering presents itself across the two different assemblies (Gianny, comments?)Sorry for this late reply. I would like to enable the WADI admin console for 2.0. I have some local changes that I will commit after having sorted out a problem with a cxf JAR. In a few words, I cannot start the admin console within Geronimo due to an IllegalArgumentException: "Class [org.apache.cxf.clustering.spring.NamespaceHandler] does not implement the NamespaceHandler interface". The console works fine in standalone Jetty, which is the out-of-the-box servlet container of grails (Groovy on Rails, which is the framework of the admin console).Unfortunately, I will not be able to complete field level and method level state replication. However, nothing will have to be done within Geronimo except adding the aspectj javaagent to benefit from load-time-weaving of aspects used to track POJO instantiation and modification. On this point, if people are interested to give me a hand, then please feel free to ask and I will check in the new wadi-aop module.Thanks, GiannyPost 2.0 ItemsWhat to do about OSGi? Seems like there has been discussion but no real movement in this area. Flexible Server (there has been some discussion on the list about allowing users without a PhD in G to create their own custom assemblies. Would be neat to Create a minimal assemblie that included ServiceMix for a lightweight ESB endpointBetter monitoring and diagnosis Thoughts?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
