Exactly.  What is the point in downloading something which is anyway not
useful.  Added to this, when I try to install the plugin a second time, it
again downloads beta1 instead of SNAPSHOT and fail with an error
"Destination C:\geronimo-
tomcat6-jee5-2.0-SNAPSHOT\repository\commonj\sdo-api-r2.1\1.0-incubating-beta1\sdo-api-r2.1-1.0-incubating-beta1.jaralready
exists!"

Vamsi

On 7/25/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

But, I believe Vasmi's point (which is valid), is that if a plugin wants a
SNAPSHOT jar, that is what our plugin code should be downloading, or it
should
be failing with an error if it cannot be downloaded from any listed
repo....


-Donald

Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
>   The repo contains commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-beta1/jar. This
> is the version that should be specified in the plugin not SNAPSHOT.
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> --- Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to install a plugin which has a dependency on
>> "commonj/sdo-
>> api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/jar".  During the stage at which the
>> depedency jar are downloaded, I see the following:
>>
>> Searching for commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/jar at
>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
>> Downloading commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-beta1/jar...
>>
>> Notice that the version it is supposed to download (this is the same
>> version
>> specified in geronimo-plugin.xml) and the one it is actually
>> downloading are
>> different.
>>
>> The plugin is failing to start and is throwing an exception with
>> "reason:
>> Unable to resolve dependency commonj/sdo-api-r2.1
>> /1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/jar".
>>
>> Any ideas on what could be wrong?  Any work-around/fix for this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's
updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
> http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
>
>


Reply via email to