Hi

I have looked at java security policy, firewall settings, sniffed the traffic and more without finding out way the connection fails. As far as I know IPv6 should normally not be a problem but I started to suspect it had something to do with it. In my case it seems to have something to do with the loopback interface.

Anyone else having problem with network access using this command?
deploy --host <local network address> --user <user> --password <password> --port 1099 login
or better yet a solution ? this may still be a configuration issue.

I will try to find out what is wrong and will get back if I find something out.

regards
 Peter

Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva wrote:
Hi Peter,

rmi runs on IPv6 here as well. I am not a network expert also, don't know if this should be a problem, as all ports opened by the java vm are on IPv6. Here port 1527 (derby) runs on Ipv6, although I could access derby from a remote machine with no hurt =]

tcp6 0 0 *:1099 *:* LISTEN 6794/java tcp6 0 0 *:1527 *:* LISTEN 6794/java
thanks,

On 8/14/07, *Peter Petersson* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Hi Rodrigo
    As I am also running G on a Ubuntu system (although it's 7.10) I
    thought I should give it a try and I get a similar problem
    (although I am not really reproducing yours).
    In my case I tried the "deploy login" command from a client also
    running Ubuntu from within a local network and surprisingly it
failed with the following
        Error: Unable to connect to server at
        deployer:geronimo:jmx://192.168.2.1:1099 -- Connection refused to
        host: 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1>; nested exception is:

    As I am trying this via a local network connection and no firewall
    rules should be in the way so I should not get "connection
    refused" but I did so if this is suppose to work right out of the
    box(?) we may have some weird problem and in my case this could be
    related to some IPv6 problem as I found out that the rmiregistry
    (port 1099) was running on IPv6

       netstat -plt
        :
tcp 0 0 *:www *:* LISTEN -
        :
tcp6 0 0 *:rmiregistry *:* LISTEN -
    I don't know way this should be a problem (I am not a network
    expert) but apparently something is wrong. However as in your case
    from local machine it works fine.
    I haven't upgraded to 2.0 yet on the server, so this test has been
    done on G v1.1.1 and FYI all the address and port binds are the
    defaults (in config.xml) so G and rmiregistry should bind to all
    interfaces.

    However In your case you get "no such object in table" which to me
    looks like you actually got the initial connection on port 1099
    but a failure in the object call (using some other port) so our
    problems may not be related but anyhow It seem you are not
    completely alone on this. You could try sniff the network traffic
    with Wireshark (you can do a apt-get if you don't have it
    already), you may whant to use some traffic filter for example
    "tcp port 1099 || tcp port XXXX" to minimize the noise.

    Sry I couldn't help you more with this, lets see what more the G
    devs have to say about it ?

    regards
Peter Petersson




    Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva wrote:
    Hi,

    I tried out 2.0-rc1 release (as posted by David to
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) and
    could reproduce bug GERONIMO-3191, which had been considered as
    closed.
    I have a Ubuntu Linux 7.04 with sun-jdk-1.5.0 running geronimo.
    From a Windows Vista Machine I ran the following command:

    deploy --host 192.168.0.11 <http://192.168.0.11> --user system
    --password manager --port 1099 login

    which returned:

    Error: Unable to connect to server at
    deployer:geronimo:jmx://192.168.0.11 -- no such object in table

    if I run it from the server Linux machine, it works.

    I haven't ever been able to access remote linux servers
    (specially from Eclipse) but this specific situation has been
    tested only on this release.

    I was wondering if anyone could reproduce it since I may have
    commited some configuration mistake. hope it helps.

    thanks,
    Rodrigo

    On 8/9/07, * David Jencks* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

        I'd recommend trying with the about to be released unless someone
        finds a major problem 2.0 release you can find here
        http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0/org/
        
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehogstrom/geronimo-2.0-rc1/geronimo-2.0/org/>
        apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-jee5/2.0/

        You won't have this exact problem because the
        JaasLoginServiceRemotingServer  gbean isn't in the latest
        version.

        If you wish to continue with 2.0-M6  the problem is that the
        JaasLoginServiceRemotingServer can't figure out what ip
        address to
        bind onto.  Have you perhaps changed var/config/config-
        substitutions.properties?  Or perhaps your hostnames aren't
        quite
        right?  something seems to expect your computer to be named
        "testing"

        thanks
        david jencks

        On Aug 9, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Filipe Sousa wrote:

        > Hi!
        >
        > I just download the last version of geronimo
        > (geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0-M6) and I'm trying to start the
        server with
        > geronimo.sh:
        > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/opt/geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0-M6/bin $ ./
        > geronimo.sh run
        >
        > but fails at 16%:
        > [****>                          ] 16%   4s Startup failed
        >
        > The stack trace start with this log (the complete log is
        attached)
        > 7:22:37,995 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting;
        GBean is
        > now in the FAILED state:
        > abstractName="org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-security/2.0-M6/car?
        > ServiceModule=org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-se
        > curity/2.0-M6/car,j2eeType=GBean,name=JaasLoginServiceRemotingServer"

        >
        > This is my first contact with geronimo, maybe I am doing
        something
        > wrong.
        >
        > Some useful information of my java environment:
        > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/opt/geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0-M6 /bin $ echo
        > $JAVA_HOME
        > /home/fsousa/opt/java/jdk1.5.0_12
        > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/opt/geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0-M6/bin $ java
        -version
        > java version "1.5.0_12"
        > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
        1.5.0_12-b04)
        > Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode)
        >
        > --
        > Filipe Sousa
        > <geronimo.log>




-- Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva
    Engenharia de Computação - Coop8
    http://www.coop8.rg.com.br
    Grêmio Politécnico - Gestão Colabora
    http://www.gremio.poli.usp.br

    "Não importa como morre o home, importa como vive." Carijó, velho
    do rio.

    "To the person with only a hammer, everything looks like a nail."
    bussdriver

-- Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva
    Engenharia de Computação - Coop8
    http://www.coop8.rg.com.br
    Grêmio Politécnico - Gestão Colabora
    http://www.gremio.poli.usp.br

    "Não importa como morre o home, importa como vive." Carijó, velho
    do rio.

    "To the person with only a hammer, everything looks like a nail."
bussdriver




--
Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva
Engenharia de Computação - Coop8
http://www.coop8.rg.com.br
Grêmio Politécnico - Gestão Colabora
http://www.gremio.poli.usp.br

"Não importa como morre o home, importa como vive." Carijó, velho do rio.

"To the person with only a hammer, everything looks like a nail." bussdriver

Reply via email to