On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
matt... just did an initial look. just a few comments for now...
- were there funcational/load issues with the daytrader 1.2 numbers
that were omitted?
Not really. The runs were clean, CPU was high and all the
fundamentals seemed to be correct. Was there something specific you
were thinking of?
- was really surprised by the slow down in the web container
primitives (probably has to do with the spec upgrade) and the jump
in direct mode performance
The primary difference there is a new Tomcat version and perhaps some
changes to our integration. Later on I'd like to do some profiling
to better understand the issues but the slow down seems to be
consistent with other performance numbers I've seen. I think the
Linux Journal guys did something in this space but I'd have to go
back and look.
- thanks for the kudos in the acknowledgements
Heh, thank you
- yes, we need to tag 1.2 and 2.0 so we can start the next turn of
the crank on 2.X
I'll start that process this week. Need to get the web pages updated
a bit as well. Lots of little stuff to do.
chris
On 10/22/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y'all a
gander at what I have for the performance report at this point. This
is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0. There are a few numbers
that are missing. I originally had planned on not producing them but
the charts look odd with the missing numbers. It includes a
comparison of 1.1.1 and 2.0.2 using DayTrader 1.2 and 2.0. Heh, we
need to release those monsters.
This should be considered an alpha release but will move quickly to
final by the end of the week :)
Please provide your feedback on content, what's interesting, not, etc.
Thanks for taking a few minutes to look at the draft.
Look at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/
Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf
Thanks
--
"I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let...
lets evolve, let the chips fall where they may." - Tyler Durden
