Here is what I have so far:
A new provider marshaler specifically for handling post parameters.
The marshaler can be configured with postParameters.
A PostParameter contains a name and an xpath expression for the value
(multiple parameters can be specified).
Is there anything available to set up a servlet inside a test case, so I can
verify the request as it is seen by the client?
http://www.nabble.com/file/p13618903/PostProviderMarshaler.diff
PostProviderMarshaler.diff 

gnodet wrote:
> 
> Another way would be to write another marshaler that will specifially
> handle
> post requests and configure it on the endpoint. I'd like to keep the
> endpoint free of properties that are not generic.
> In addition to the marshaler, we could add another endpoint if needed, so
> that you can configure the properties on a HttpPostProviderEndpoint (which
> would use the post marshaler by default).
> 
> On 11/5/07, MrRothstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I would like to take a crack at SM-580. The patch attached seems to apply
>> to
>> the HttpEndpoint. I would like to do make the fix for
>> HttpProviderEndpoint.
>>
>> It seems easy enough:
>> Add property to endpoint
>> Set property to marshaller in endpoint init
>> Have the marshaller look up property (same as contentType/locationUri)
>> prior to formatting http request
>>
>> Is that about right?
>>
>> My only issue with this is figuring out what to do if the contentType
>> does
>> not evaluate to post, should the existence of a post parameter override
>> content type or an exception raised?
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/SM-580-tf4754351s12049.html#a13595419
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/SM-580-tf4754351s12049.html#a13618903
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  • SM-580 MrRothstein
    • Re: SM-580 MrRothstein

Reply via email to