AWESOME!!!!
Gianny Damour wrote: > Hi, > > Some heads-up. > > I will soon add gshell-remote-client/common/server, gshell-whisper and > mina dependencies so that we can remote control servers. In other words, > it will increase a little bit more. > > This may still change, however here is a list of the new commands: > * alias: to create an alias; > * unalias: to remove an alias; > * execute-alias: to execute an alias; > * remote/rsh: rsh client; > * remote-rsh-server: rsh server; > * remote-control/server-control: to execute a control operation > start/stop, for a remote server. This command rsh to a gshell instance > where the server is to be started or stopped and execute the proper > command. > > Aliases will be stored in etc/aliases.xml and users will be able to > alter that if they want via CLI option. remote-control/server-control > uses a hierarchical tree to defined hosts along with how to remote login > to a gshell running on this instance and commands to control servers. > > Thanks, > Gianny > > > On 02/12/2007, at 12:29 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > >> The core muck is a little over 1m, but for the G integration we are >> using Groovy for commands, which adds about 2.5m for the core runtime >> and then its got a few deps too. I can work on optimizing this a bit, >> have not really paid much attention, aside from trying to keep the >> GShell core size as small as possible. >> >> I think we can put most of its deps in the repo and just hardcode them >> in the classworlds conf for now. Next version will dynamically pull >> them out of the repo in the same way that mvn plugins do. >> >> --jason >> >> >> On Dec 1, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: >> >>> Damn gshell...WTF? >>> >>> :-) >>> >>> I couldn't resist ;-) >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> Jason Dillon wrote: >>>> No doubt some increase is from the gshell libs. We can probably >>>> optimize them a little and use repository references and such... >>>> >>>> --jason >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: "Bruce Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 14:52:44 >>>> To:[email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: Our 2.1 assemblies are nearly 2x the size of 2.0.2 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2007 3:59 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> It looks like the size of our images is increasing dramatically >>>>> (nearly 2x). >>>>> >>>>> For example, the geronimo-jetty6-minimal snapshots have been growing >>>>> like this (these image sizes are from the snapshot repo): >>>>> >>>>> 16604006 Jul 26 18:54 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20070726.182538-1-bin.tar.gz >>>>> 17086729 Jul 26 18:53 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20070726.182538-1-bin.zip >>>>> >>>>> 22310769 Nov 1 03:19 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20071101.014839-2-bin.tar.gz >>>>> 22744083 Nov 1 03:18 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20071101.014839-2-bin.zip >>>>> >>>>> 30812531 Nov 30 22:45 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20071130.211933-3-bin.tar.gz >>>>> 31248864 Nov 30 22:43 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20071130.211933-3-bin.zip >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The javaee5 images have also grown significantly. >>>>> >>>>> 57099671 Jul 26 18:39 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-jee5-2.1-20070726.182538-1-bin.tar.gz >>>>> 58685668 Jul 26 18:36 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-jee5-2.1-20070726.182538-1-bin.zip >>>>> >>>>> 55113050 Nov 1 03:28 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-20071101.014839-1-bin.tar.gz >>>>> 56827820 Nov 1 03:25 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-20071101.014839-1-bin.zip >>>>> >>>>> 71313050 Nov 30 22:54 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-20071130.211933-2-bin.tar.gz >>>>> 73094816 Nov 30 22:50 >>>>> geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-20071130.211933-2-bin.zip >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I haven't looked into the cause yet ... but does anybody have some >>>>> ideas >>>>> on the culprit? >>>> >>>> FWIW, we've experienced the same thing with ServiceMix. I think it >>>> might be a problem with Maven and how it's resolving and including >>>> transitive dependencies. >>>> >>>> Bruce >>
