I think it could all be combined into a single page with different sections
like supported/certified platforms, plugins, etc.
I guess the page name will come up naturally once we figure out how to present
that info
speaking of plugins, we could try to find a way to build this info directly
from the geronimo-plugins.xml
Cheers!
Hernan
Jason Warner wrote:
Touche', Joe. Touche'.
On Feb 11, 2008 1:54 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Jason Warner wrote:
> Vamsi, I think that falls right in line with what I was saying
in the
> other thread. Take a look and see if you agree.
>
> ~Jason Warner
Which I think falls right in line with what I said earlier in this
thread too. :-)
Joe
>
> On Feb 11, 2008 1:40 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> I am indifferent to whether someone is repackaging Geronimo or
> providing a plugin on top of Geronimo. All I want to know is if
> something is running on Geronimo (or a derivative) in production.
>
> ++Vamsi
>
>
> On Feb 11, 2008 9:44 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Along the same lines as the other discussion topic on
adding a
>> "Ready for Geronimo" page under the Community section of our
>> website...
>>
>> How about we create a "Powered by Geronimo" page that would
>> help recognize the projects that provide a Geronimo based
>> bundle (like Liferay) and companies that provide
applications
>> or servers based on Geronimo (like Intalio and IBM.)
>>
>> A sample can be found on our wiki at -
>>
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxSITE/Powered+by+Geronimo
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I'm willing to listen to contrary opinions, but I'd be
against
> this. This seems to be listing sources for Geronimo
support. As
> defined, we'd be willing to list companies that rebundle (and
> support) Geronimo, but not companies that support Geronimo
> directly. We could fix this by redefine "Powered by" to
include
> those companies, also.
> I'd prefer to leave the whole issue untouched...
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
