On Feb 10, 2008 11:29 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Feb 9, 2008 12:02 PM, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 7, 2008 6:58 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Geronimo had a great year 2007. I don't need to re-list all our > > > achievements listed in Matt's mail from 31st Dec 2007 > > > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg54994.html). > > Now > > > that 2.1 is also rolling out, I think it is time we start discussing > > what we > > > want to do in Geronimo in year 2008. Let us also discuss what we > > "must" do > > > to make Geronimo an application server of choice. I would like all of > > us to > > > use this mail thread to put forth our thoughts (and any action items > > some of > > > us may have already come up with silently) so that the community can > > see > > > what great heights Geronimo will scale in 2008. > > > > We certainly need more exposure in the tools area and having a > > Geronimo NetBeans plugin is a way to go. Eclipse one's fine, but we > > need to bring Geronimo to NetBeans masses and let them know there's > > another application server with a name that starts with G which is > > worth paying attention to as well. > > > > Documentation, documentation and no need to say more but documentation > > is an absolute must. > > In most cases, we have an associated JIRA for a new feature or a major bug > fix. How about we designate the JIRA as resolved only after the related > documentation is in place? Many a time we verify the code before closing > the JIRA. It shouldn't be hard adding a wiki page with a small write up on > how to use that feature or any work around provided. It can be a detailed > document or an entry in an FAQ. This will also help in coming up with > comprehensive docs after a release. > My +1 too. Good practice. > > > > > > > > Jacek > > > > -- > > Jacek Laskowski > > http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl > > > > -- Thanks, Shiva
