I'm glad the question has been brought up, i was wondering myself... Ditto above
Also, for the sections that are in 2.0 users that are not on 2.1 users - does this mean we have decided to not transfer these sections over? (i.e. some of the sample applications) or is it because some of the documentation outline for 2.1 is not complete yet. Wishing you all the best, Joseph Leong On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Warner wrote: > > What's the "need update" column for on the 2.0 Update status page? Is > that > > to mark a page that is moved over but still needs someone who knows what > the > > article is talking about to update it based on 2.1? > > Good question. I've been treating it as "needs rework to move to 2.1" > for planning purposes, but I agree this column can have many meanings. > An official statement would be helpful. > -- > Thanks, Dan Becker > email: mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
