What happened to this vote? I checked the tags and the code was never moved over. Did this pass? Do we have an official binary I can link to on the wiki docs?
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 4:52 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Lin Sun wrote: > > > The .project and .classpath files are used when the plugins are loaded > > in Eclipse IDE. You are right they don't have ASL license headers > > but I don't see license headers associated with these files normally. > > The files in the geronimo eclipse plugin don't have ASL license > > headers either. Also, these files are not in the assembly. > > Are these files machine generated? Whether or not they end up in an > assembly doesn't really matter... They seem non-trivial to me and > should have a license header. > > > > > > > I am not sure what we need to do with jboss here. Of course we are > > using it since it is a migration tool from jboss to geronimo. Any > > advice here? > > > I did a little research for this. It seems we must avoid implying that > JBoss is the source of this code. As long as the distribution name > (and executable name, I would think) don't use "JBoss" in the name > we're doing this. Internal file names should be fine. So, in my > opinion, we're ok here... > > So, pending the license header and file permission questions, I'd say > this looks good. > > --kevan > > -- ~Jason Warner
