Hi Sergio, On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:27 PM, zeros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Good morning: > > I'm having problems deploying an EJB3 with a deployment descriptor. I've > not had any problems deploying it only with tags, but when I add the > ejb-jar.xml to fix the final values Geronimo detects the EJB like an EJB2 > instead of 3. > What do you mean by deploying it only with tags?
> > I've found no example of Geronimo, ejb-jar.xml and EJB3. Maybe anyone > has tested it? It should be possible as the deployment descriptor is > optional, but not deprecated. > > > Thanks in advance > > (Here I attach my ejb-jar.xml) > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <ejb-jar version="3.0" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"; > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/ejb-jar_3_0.xsd";> > <enterprise-beans> > <session> > <ejb-name>HelloWorldBean</ejb-name> > <remote>test.vpod.HelloWorld</remote> > <local>test.vpod.HelloWorldLocal</local> > <ejb-class>test.vpod.HelloWorldBean</ejb-class> > <session-type>Stateless</session-type> > <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type> > </session> > </enterprise-beans> > </ejb-jar> > -- You do not seem to have business interfaces defined? Without business interfaces, I believe that the ejb will be treated similar to an ejb 2.1 bean for lookup. Business interfaces are defined using the the elements business-local and business-remote in the plan. Regards Manu > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/ejb-jar.xml-and-EJB-3.0-tp16249489s134p16249489.html > Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
