-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
David Jencks wrote:Geronimo is still using ActiveMQ 4 and I've applied patches for or fixed a few bugs that are fairly important for getting MDBS working reliably and fixing other problems. So, I'd like to get a release out of the 4.x branch for the upcoming Geronimo 2.1.1 release.I agree ... it would be great to get those included in 2.1.1.I've looked through the jiras for 4.x and applied the patches for ones that I had a clue about. If anyone else wants something fixed in 4.x please speak up.ActiveIO trunk has a fix that we'd like (don't put non-strings in system properties) so I'd like to release ActiveIO 3.1 also. Since that requires java 5 I'd like to update activemq 4 to use java 5 also (I've tried and this is easy to do). What's the community feeling on this? Is this a real no-no? Would it be better to have the version 4.2 and preserve 4.1.x for java 1.4 work?I'm sure others have more informed opinions on this than I do. I personally can't think of a reason that we should need another java 1.4 release but it certainly is nice to have the option ... so I think it would make sense to do the java 5 work in a 4.2 branch. Although I have to admit that I'm getting a little nervous at all the moving parts for 2.1.1.I'd like to also update the poms to use more modern maven release procedures as well.... I haven't looked into this much yet and will post further when I do.thanks david jencks
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
