sounds good to me too. +1 Ted
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What you outlined below sounds good. +1 > > > -Donald > > > Joe Bohn wrote: >> >> Aside from the summary/questions listed by Hernan on 4/28 (with response >> by Kevan on 4/28, 5/23 and comment by Hernan on 5/28) ... I don't see any >> other conclusion or summary. There is also some reference to the spaces and >> groups in our wiki [3] ... but it isn't very specific on these points beyond >> the presence of the groups and a brief descriptions. The PMC vote >> requirement was dropped by Kevan in the 4/28 response. >> >> Also, on 4/18 David Blevins added this comment in the thread: >> "I definitely think our website should remain restricted to committers. I >> sort of see that as separate from the rest of our spaces. " >> >> >> Based on what we have been doing since this discussion and the way things >> are configured at the moment in confluence this seems to be the current >> approach: >> >> 1. Access to all of our wiki spaces is via the geronimo-contributor group >> (geronimo-committers also has access to all wiki spaces). >> 2. Any user with a CLA on file can be granted access to the >> geronimo-contributor group without a PMC vote. >> 3. The only record maintained of write access is in the >> geronimo-contributors group itself. >> 4. Geronimo site authorization (GMOxSITE) is exclusively administered via >> the geronimo-committers group. >> 5. Only those with commit authority on Geronimo are currently included in >> the geronimo-committers group. >> >> >> I agree that getting more folks contributing on doc is a very good thing. >> We have accomplished that via the CLA wiki access. However, it seems to me >> that write access to our site requires a bit more trust. The site is the >> official face of Geronimo to the outside world. I'm inclined to keep this >> restricted to committers but I'm certainly open to other ideas. >> >> >> [3] >> http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/geronimo-cwiki-documentation-architecture.html >> >> >> Joe >> >> >> >> Ted Kirby wrote: >>> >>> Kevan's proposal to start the discussion in the thread you referenced >>> seems good to me. What was the end result of the discussion? Is the >>> agreed-upon process documented somewhere? I agree with Donald. >>> Having a CLA on file would be a good pre-req to me. It seems Kevan >>> also proposed an additional pre-req of being anointed a contributor by >>> PMC vote, which also seems fine to me. Getting more folks who are >>> willing and able to contribute to doc seems a very good thing to me! >>> >>> Ted >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> And we also need to consider this for the Powered by Geronimo page that >>>> we >>>> keep talking about adding in GMOxSITE and allowing others to help >>>> maintain.... >>>> >>>> I don't have a strong opinion either way. Having a CLA on file would be >>>> enough for me to let someone have access to GMOxSITE, but I'm not sure >>>> what >>>> the ASF stance is on project web sites.... >>>> >>>> >>>> -Donald >>>> >>>> >>>> Joe Bohn wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I suspect that we want to limit write access to GMOxSITE to Geronimo >>>>> committers only .... but thought it should be officially discussed and >>>>> clarified, hence this note: >>>>> >>>>> Back when we discussed write access to our wiki [1] we were focused >>>>> just >>>>> on the wiki itself. However, in some subsequent discussions GMOxSITE >>>>> was >>>>> mentioned as well. We now have a request for write access to GMOxSITE >>>>> by a >>>>> Geronimo contributor with a CLA on file. I believe that the unspoken >>>>> intention was that access to GMOxSITE should be only granted to >>>>> Geronimo >>>>> committers. Is that correct? This request is coming from the >>>>> discussion >>>>> on adding some Accessibility guidelines [2]. >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be ok to add the guidelines to the wiki and point to >>>>> them >>>>> from our site. I also think it would be ok to include them directly in >>>>> the >>>>> site if added by a committer. Would it be necessary to add the >>>>> contribution to a JIRA (with rights granted to Apache) for the latter? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--Policy-for-granting-write-access-to-our-Wiki-tt16724609s134.html#a16724609 >>>>> >>>>> [2] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Fixing-usability-accessibility-issues-in-Admin-Console-p19025657s134.html >>>>> >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>> >> >> >
