NP ... when you mentioned you might be releasing saaj I just thought it
might be a good time to try to get this cleaned up too. Since we've
been releasing effectively without sites (or broken sites) for some time
now I don't think it should hinder the vote. I just thought I'd mention
the problem since you did include the site in the vote.
One more question: Has any tck validation been performed for this
updated spec?
Joe
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Doh! You did mention this issue to me before and I totally forgot. Now
I'm not sure what to do. Maybe we could release the artifacts without
the site?
Jarek
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are some issues with the maven generated site. These aren't new
problems and they are "doc" related ... so I'm not sure if they should
really hinder the spec release.
I just started looking into them since I had some of the same problems with
the recent samples 2.1.2 release (BTW ... not all of those issues were
resolved either before we released).
- The Geronimo banner isn't included. I think we need to make some updates
to the spec-parent site.xml (and pom.xml) and do a new release of the
specs-parent to fix this issue. However, on my local image some of the same
changes that I made in samples to resolve this are not providing the same
magic for specs ... still looking into this.
- There are multiple links in the banner to Geronimo (on the right) and none
of them take you to the Geronimo home page. Once again, I think this might
require some changes to the site.xml in spec-parent to fix it.
Joe
