I did the basic reorganization in rev 746112. We probably want to
change some groupIds if everyone is OK with the change.
On Feb 18, 2009, at 4:46 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Feb 18, 2009, at 7:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Sounds worth the time to try it out.
Two requests:
1) If this works, we publish the framework assembly instead of the
two minimal assemblies to the Download page for 2.2, as this would
allow users to build their own custom minimal server assembly (and
of course some docs telling users how to create the old minimal
assembly from this new framework assembly.)
I'm neutral or slightly +0.1 on this idea. I don't actually see
how it relates to my proposal but if everyone agrees I'm fine with
this idea.
Less = more IMO, so I'm +1
I guess this should be a separate vote...
2) If time permits, can we move or duplicate relevant testsuite
modules into a new testsuite dir under either the framework dir or
a new framework-testsuite dir, so that we can verify the basic
framework cmdline scripts and installing plugins (like Jetty/
Tomcat to make an equivalent minimal assembly)?
I like this idea. For a few months now when I work on a plugin set
(mconsole, activemq) I've included a custom server aseembly in the
plugin group and added at least one integration test. This has
really helped speed up feature development. IIUC you are proposing
doing the same for framework.
Sure, +1
I haven't done this yet. I don't think we have any integration tests
that run on framework yet. I'll probably come up with some simple
ones soon.
thanks
david jencks
--jason
