Agree that we shouldn't make any major changes, now that we have branched, but some console changes are okay, as long as we keep the testsuite passing... :-)

I'd also like to see us switch form the geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec to the properly versioned geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec for this release, which would require a release vote for that one, too (since the only thing that has changed is the artifact name and to use the new genesis 2.0.)


-Donald


David Jencks wrote:
After some work I got the 2.2 branch made, now we just have to release it :-)

Lets not delay further by putting more core functionality in. However, I would be fine with stuff like admin console improvements that don't rewrite large sections of the console. If anyone has plans for changes of this kind please respond to this email describing what they are.

Other stuff to do (no doubt incomplete):

external dependencies.

Activemq thinks they might have a 5.3 release by the end of the month.
Jetty is progressing towards a 7 release, possibly by the end of the month.
My impression is that openejb can be released pretty quickly as needed.

Internal dependencies:

specs
txmanager
tomcat
xbean

I'm planning to start releasing internal dependencies next week.

comments?

thanks
david jencks



Reply via email to