do we plan to release javamail alpha specs only or specs and impl? i ll vote for both
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > 1.8.0 sounds good. If anyone with a setup to run TCKs can do it it > would be awesome otherwise we can do a 1.8.0-alpha-1 without this > check. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-12-03 13:59 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <[email protected]>: >> Hi Devs, >> >> last geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release (1.7.1) was back in 2010. >> Since then the following issues were fixed: >> >> GERONIMO-5842 >> GERONIMO-6165 >> GERONIMO-6438 >> GERONIMO-6471 >> GERONIMO-6480 >> GERONIMO-6530 >> + some NOTICE/legal stuff >> >> I'd like to propose to make a new release (1.7.2 or maybe 1.8.0 ?) >> because of the above mentioned fixes and the fact that this is >> prerequisite to make a new javamail 1.4 provider impl release (which >> will fix a lot of longstanding bugs). >> >> I volunteer to drive this but i need some help because geronimo >> release/QA process is new to me. >> Maybe its also necessary/useful to run the TCKs to which i had no access >> (yet). >> >> Opinions? >> >> Thanks >> Hendrik >> >> >> -- >> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) >> @hendrikdev22 >> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
