Hi,

  For 1, it will be nice to be able to build geronimo server with more
packaging/assembly options. For example, it will be very useful to be able
to have an assembly that supports tomcat war without ejb, rar, ear. Also,
it will be very useful as well to be able to customize assembly options at
the framework level to fine services to be bundled in.

Regards

Jack

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Txs Alan!
>
>
> I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo project
> basically consists of 2 different things.
> 1.) the Geronimo EE server
> 2.) all the rest ;)
>
> 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant people
> interested in continueing with 1?
>
> Should we reflect this in the report?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Here's my initial draft:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-04+-+April
> >
> > If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the page
> directly.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
>
>

Reply via email to