Tamaya is far beyond a JSR in design and impl. It is a promishing product but too opponiated to be a JSR today IMO. Config needs something smaller. DS solution is a pretty good start for that.
Le 15 juil. 2016 00:33, "Oliver B. Fischer" <[email protected]> a écrit : > I a little bit confused. As I know our common goal is to establish a > configuration JSR based on Tamaya. I wouldn't like to see here a race for > the one how submits its JSR first.... > > > Am 15.07.16 um 00:24 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: > >> +1 Mark if it can be a real JSR otherwise we can stick with DS and Tamaya >> for asf. >> >> >> Le 15 juil. 2016 00:20, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> Doesn't this overlap with another project you've been involved with, >>> Tamaya? >>> >>> On Jul 14, 2016 6:10 PM, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks! >>> >>> I’ve started to extract the configuration work I’ve done in OWB, MyFaces >>> and DeltaSpike into an own little project. >>> For the MyFaces and DeltaSpike parts I got help from ASF member Gerhard >>> Petracek. >>> >>> My goal is to establish an own JSR for configuration. >>> >>> So far it consists of 2 classes for the API and 4 classes for the SPI. >>> The source can be found here. >>> https://github.com/struberg/javaConfig >>> >>> And that’s pretty much it! There is not much more needed for it. >>> >>> I would love to move this to Geronimo. Simply because geronimo is kind of >>> an EE-commons for the ASF nowadays ;) >>> >>> wdyt? >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf > >
