Hi Rüdiger! I think it would be fine if it could operate without MP Config. I was actually thinking that configuration could be more of an SPI, rather than a hard requirement. E.g. one impl for MP Config, another for ConfigJSR, and maybe a default one with system properties enabled?
And you are correct, that was my strawman placeholder to solve it, but agree that it will not work 100% If you want to create a pull request, first fork https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard then make your changes in your fork. You should then see an option in github to raise a PR. John On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 1:03 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey guys > > Should Safeguard run even without a MP-Config implementation? I think it > would be cool if it did. > > Method `ExecutionPlanFactory#enableNonFallbacksForMicroProfile` looks a > little bit like it tries to, but line 141 catches only > `ClassNotFoundException`. If it would also catch `NoClassDefFoundError` and > `ExceptionInInitializerError`, it would actually work. > > I could create a pull request, but I can't see how? > > > Rüdiger > > BTW: On http://geronimo.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/contributor-process.html > there's a broken link to the mailing lists. It's falsely ` > http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing.html` > <http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing.html>, but it should be ` > http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing-lists.html` > <http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing-lists.html>. I don't have rights for > the wiki. > >
