This is great Lewis!
Just quick silly question here mate,  is this for all GORA-174 related
patches? or is this only for the GORA-174 patch?


Renato M.

2013/3/11 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>:
> Thanks for making this happen Lewis.
>
> - Henry
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Our build is here
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/Gora/job/GORA_174/
>>
>> Time for (a several beers on the way) home
>>
>> Later
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> > I feel we are struggling somewhat to co-ordinate and address GORA-174.
>> > It is by no means an easy issue, and it has flagged up a lot more than I
>> > think most of us originally anticipated...
>> > Although this is a pain, it is also a major benefit for us as there is
>> now
>> > motivation to address the issues and make Gora better in the process.
>> > The branch of trunk can be found at [0].
>> > As Renato and myself did with the goraamazon branch, I think this will be
>> > a case of setting up the build on Jenkins, and plugging away until we get
>> > it stable and then we merge it back into trunk.
>> > I would ask that ANYONE that makes changes to trunk, also merges the
>> > changes into the GORA_174 branch. This means that we keep them both in
>> sync
>> > and when we eventually come to merging both branches, we can do so in a
>> > timely and stress free manner.
>> > It is OK for us to commit GORA-174 on the GORA_174 branch, then address
>> > the individual failing tests... this is the purpose of this exercise.
>> >
>> > Thanks all, have a great weekend.
>> >
>> > Lewis
>> >
>> > [0] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gora/branches/GORA_174/
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Lewis*
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Lewis*
>>

Reply via email to