On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > What we did for Phoenix is make an initial ASF release that was the > > granted code with a package name search-and-replace and minor version > > increment. This let us focus on all the Apache packaging and release > > concerns like NOTICE file wording, RAT compliance, etc. and provided an > > opportunity for existing users to migrate to an ASF artifact at low risk > - > > just package renames. Then we made a major version increment and put in > > some significant new features for that next release. > > > > > > > I think we should do this. > > Lets stamp it 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT and do a release *tout de suite* that is > effectually the same as our 3.0.4 only it has new apache packaging and then > move forward from there. >
+1 > > Letting above hang another few days in case more opinions otherwise will > move on the above > Thanks, > St.Ack > > > > > > > > On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I think going backwards to 1.0 would be confusing for any existing > users. > > > Maybe make the -incubating releases pickup 3.1.x with the intention of > > the > > > first graduated release being 4.0.0. Could be seen as artificially > > > inflating the version numbers, but I don't think that matters too > much. I > > > assume (prefer) we'll follow the guidelines of semantic versioning. > > > > > > -n > > > > > >> On Friday, December 5, 2014, Colin McCabe <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> I looked at > > >> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-versioning > > >> and it doesn't say whether we need to start at 1. Hmm. > > >> > > >> I think either way could work. There is stuff from org.htrace up on > > >> Maven central, but since we're moving to org.apache.htrace, we won't > > >> conflict if we choose to go back to 1.0.0. I don't really have any > > >> preference between 1.0.0 or 4.0.0. > > >> > > >> best, > > >> Colin > > >> > > >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Stack <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > >> wrote: > > >>> org.htrace was at 3.0.4 > > >>> > > >>> The next release could be 4.0.0. > > >>> > > >>> Or we could roll back and make it 1.0.0? > > >>> > > >>> Any opinions out there? > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> St.Ack > > >> > > >
