On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 12:57 PM Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 1/31/22 10:10 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > Are we now finished with improving the PCRE2 capabilities with regards to > > allocation / performance? > > > > I see the following revisions that would need to be backported on top of > > the above patch: > > > > 1897240 > > 1897241 > > 1897244 > > 1897248 > > 1897250 > > 1897260 > > 1897261 > > 1897263 > > 1897386 > > 1897459 > > 1897460 > > 1897461 > > 1897462 > > 1897472 > > 1897543 > > > > > > Did I miss any?
r1897242 :) > > Looking further into this I guess backporting > > 1612934 > 1612940 > 1613189 > > makes sense as well (Add compiled and loaded PCRE version numbers to "httpd > -V" output and to mod_info page). > > Question is if this should be a separate backport or merged with this > backport. If it is a separate backport, we > have an order dependency between these backports. I have created https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/289 with all of those, the first commit being the current backport proposal (once it's backported I can still rebase). The whole works for me, I'll +1 the current proposal first (even though I'd prefer that we build with pcre1 by default if both are available) and hopefully we can have the second series voted in the same release.. Regards; Yann.
