On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 3:17 PM <minf...@apache.org> wrote: > > Author: minfrin > Date: Sat Nov 18 14:17:11 2023 > New Revision: 1913936 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913936&view=rev > Log: > Update vote, note need for mmn bump. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1913936&r1=1913935&r2=1913936&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Sat Nov 18 14:17:11 2023 > @@ -174,10 +174,13 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > *) mod_proxy: prevent bad busy values and problems with bybusyness > Trunk version of patch: > https://svn.apache.org/r1912245 > + https://svn.apache.org/r1913930 > svn merge -c 1912245 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > - +1: jfclere, minfrin > + svn merge -c 1913930 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > + +1: minfrin, ylavic > ylavic: +1 with r1913930, we can't provide exported functions w/o an > ap_[proxy_] prefix. > + minfrin: r1913930 added, votes reset, mmn bump needed
Do we need an MMN bump for some ap_proxy_ functions added to proxy_util.h (non public header), though AP_PROXY_DECLARE()d because they need to be accessible from several proxy modules SSOs? Regards; Yann.
