+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Steven!
Best regards, Honah On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 2:39 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Kevin Liu > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:00 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:02 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:54 AM Anurag Mantripragada >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) .Thanks Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> Anurag Mantripragada >>>> >>>> On Jul 11, 2024, at 10:27 AM, Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (binding) Thanks for doing this, Steven. >>>> Yufei >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:16 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> + 1 (non-binding). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:25 AM Péter Váry < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, 17:31 Jack Ye <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 3:37 AM Piotr Findeisen < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it looks it's part of the spec that's not connected to the other >>>>>>>> parts of the spec (like "dead code") >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 08:30, Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:29 AM Ajantha Bhat < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - Ajantha >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:50 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > Following the latest community guidelines, I would like to >>>>>>>>>>> start a voting thread on removing the JSON spec for content file >>>>>>>>>>> and file >>>>>>>>>>> scan task. Here is the PR for the spec change [1] >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > This was previously discussed in the dev mailing list [2]. >>>>>>>>>>> While it is good to add the JSON serializer in iceberg-core for >>>>>>>>>>> ContentFile >>>>>>>>>>> and FileScanTask, their JSON formats don't need to be added to the >>>>>>>>>>> core >>>>>>>>>>> table spec. >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> > Steven >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9771 >>>>>>>>>>> > [2] >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2ty27yx4q0zlqd5h71cyyhb5k47yf9bv >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>
