Vote has completed and the Proposal is approved +1 Votes From
Steven Wu Yufei Gu Amogh Jahagirdar Jack Ye Daniel Weeks Eduard Tudenhöfner Jean-Baptiste Onofré On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:11 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 2:52 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> Yufei >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:47 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1, I've been reviewing this proposal/spec change for a bit and I think >>> it's in a good state for the community to work on an implementation. >>> >>> Thanks Russell for driving this! >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:31 PM Jack Ye <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1, overall agree that we should add this! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Jack Ye >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:43 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Russell! >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:57 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I left a few comments on the proposal but I'm overall +1 on the >>>>>> proposal >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did a review on the proposal and it looks good to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:55 PM Russell Spitzer >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Hi Y'all! >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I think we are more or less in agreement on adding Row Lineage to >>>>>>> the spec apart from a few details which may change a bit during >>>>>>> implementation. Because of this, I'd like to call for an overall vote on >>>>>>> whether or not Row-Lineage as described in PR 11130 can be added to the >>>>>>> spec. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I'll note this is basically giving a thumbs up for reviewers and >>>>>>> implementers to go ahead with the pull-request and acknowledging that >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> support the direction this proposal is going. I do think we'll probably >>>>>>> dig >>>>>>> a few things out when we write the reference implementation, but I >>>>>>> think in >>>>>>> general we have defined the required behaviors we want to see. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>>>>>> > [ ] -0 >>>>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . . >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks everyone, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Russ >>>>>>> >>>>>>
