Hi Lan,
Thanks for the KIP. Decoupling these is a good idea.

AS1: This is a change to the coordinator runtime and there
are two concrete implementations, the group coordinator and
the share coordinator. I think it would be equally valuable
to have `share.coordinator.append.max.buffer.size`.
The same default of 1*1024*1024 seems appropriate to me.

Thanks,
Andrew
________________________________________
From: Lan Ding <isdin...@163.com>
Sent: 20 August 2025 14:57
To: dev@kafka.apache.org <dev@kafka.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1196: Introduce group.coordinator.append.max.bytes 
config

Hi Chia-Ping,



Thanks for the feedback. The original configuration name was potentially 
ambiguous;

it has therefore been renamed to `group.coordinator.append.max.buffer.size`.



chia_00:

Update the vaild values of group.coordinator.append.max.buffer.size to be

less than message.max.bytes.



chia_01:

Yes, I agree. Make this config to be updated dynamically.



chia_02:

I agree with you. Since the buffer behavior is a soft limit, this change should

not impact any existing functionality or require special compatibility measures.



Best,

Lan




At 2025-08-18 00:54:15, "Chia-Ping Tsai" <chia7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>hi Lan
>
>chia_00:
>
>The `group.coordinator.append.max.bytes` must be smaller than the max
>message size; Otherwise, it could generate an invalid record
>
>chia_01:
>
>Since the max message size is a dynamic configuration, should we also make
>`group.coordinator.append.max.bytes` dynamic?
>
>chia_02:
>
>Is compatibility necessary? The max buffer of the new coordinator is
>currently transparent to users, so I don't think there are any users
>explicitly setting the max message size to control the buffer used by the
>new coordinator
>
>Best,
>Chia-Ping
>
>
>Lan Ding <isdin...@163.com> 於 2025年8月18日 週一 上午12:37寫道:
>
>> Hello everyone, I'd like to discuss a KIP regarding introducing a new
>> configuration,
>> group.coordinator.append.max.bytes Thank you! KIP link:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/hA5JFg Best, Lan Ding

Reply via email to