Hi Lucas, Thanks for the feedback.
My original intention was to use "estimate" in the metric name as the differentiator, but I agree that this is not very clear. How does changing the metric name to "in-memory-state-num-keys" sound? Thanks, Evan On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 1:21 AM Lucas Brutschy via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Evan, > > thanks for the KIP! > > If this is specific to in-memory stores, I wonder if we should add > this to the metric name? People could become confused that rocksDB > state is not showing up. > > Cheers, > Lucas > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 1:40 AM Evan Zhou via dev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to start the discussion for KIP-1250, which adds a new metric to > > track the size of in-memory state stores. Today, a similar metric exists > in > > Kafka, but only for RocksDB, and this KIP intends to close that gap. > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/noTMFw > > > > Thanks, > > Evan >
