Hello Samuel,

First, never use Windows date/time as reference, it is just a view of your local repo and there no link with git information.
> In GIT, as shown above, all dates of *.sci are actually very recent.
Not really, in fact image/view of the repo on your system have recent dates. Windows file system dates can change on clone, pull/rebase, checkout...

for example:
$ ls -lA savematfile.sci
-rw-r--r-- 1 tonio 197121 16480 *oct.  25  2017* savematfile.sci

$ touch savematfile.sci && ls -lA savematfile.sci
-rw-r--r-- 1 tonio 197121 16480 *nov.  17 15:35* savematfile.sci

But for git the file is not modified.
Regards,
Antoine
Le 17/11/2018 à 14:01, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :

Dear devs,

In order to understand how the bug 15877 <http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15877> has recently appeared and why this patch <https://codereview.scilab.org/20514> has recently regressed, i was looking at the modifications dates of files in SCI/matio/macros in GIT - branch 6.0

and was comparing them with histories of files as available on http://gitweb.scilab.org

In GIT, as shown above, all dates of *.sci are actually very recent.
However, last changes reported by gitweb histories are all in 2017, for instance


Knowing that the last 6.0=> master merge was done on 2018-10-22 <https://codereview.scilab.org/#/c/20575/>, so after
the 2018-09-23 modification done on savematfile.sci as reported on GIT,
how is this possible?
From where these discrepancies come from?
What is reliable for the code follow-up?

Thanks
Best regards
Samuel





_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to