Le 22/01/2019 à 16:25, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
Hello Stéphane,
Le 17/01/2019 à 08:37, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
Hello Samuel,
I have initially voted for this behavior (sparse([]) == ( 0, 0) zero
sparse matrix ) but your remark on numerous occurences of
"sparse([])" in scilab prevented to do so.
Why? My remark aimed to bring the attention to existing occurrences
and to prevent merging the commit without updating them, not to
prevent updating them.
Then these occurrences changed your opinion and vote, not mine.
Best regards
Samuel
Please see comment #8:
Anyway, *as bug #15758 is not related to sparse([]) being not sparse*,
and considered the numerous side effects, I will restore sparse([]) ==
double empty matrix. *If you find necessary to have sparse([]) == sparse
empty matrix, please file a bug/whish on BZ.*
S.
Please see
https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/2/c3RlcGhhbmUubW90dGVsZXRAdXRjLmZy/codereview.scilab.org/#/c/20492/
and the discussion starting at Patch Set 8.
S.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.scilab.org
https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/1/c3RlcGhhbmUubW90dGVsZXRAdXRjLmZy/lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
--
Stéphane Mottelet
Ingénieur de recherche
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
Tel : +33(0)344234688
http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
