Classifieds are limited to the same character set as <artifactId>s and
<type>s for the same reason that they will form part of the filename.

On Thu 7 Sep 2017 at 08:26, Chris Graham <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Karl,
>
> Did you ever find what you were looking for?
>
> I came across this in a search on classifiers as I want to be able to
> access them as a part of a filter/transformation when the assemble plugin
> does it's job.
>
> I am finding that classifiers are not well documented their usage at all!
> :-(
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 29 Dec 2015, at 5:33 am, Karl Heinz Marbaise <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tibor,
> >
> >> On 12/28/15 7:22 PM, Tibor Digana wrote:
> >> Hm, classifiers in plugins, not really used at all. Dependencies yes. I
> >> guess classifier is more overhead and evil than benefit.
> >
> > If you build for several environments than you need classifiers (e.g.
> with maven-assembly-plugin), maven-jar-plugin (test-jar, jar),
> maven-deploy-plugin, maven-source-plugin, maven-javadoc-plugin..just
> mention some examples.. etc...i wouldn't call it evil...
> >
> >> I remember Maven docu talked about classifier jdk1.5 as an example and
> >> maybe environment specifics, but I guess it was the only examples in the
> >> tutorial.
> >
> > Yes that's what i know of as well...
> >
> >> Regarding valid characters in classifier - no idea if any exists.
> >
> > Exactly that's what i'm searching for...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <[email protected]
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >>    Hi,
> >>
> >>    during my implementations i have come to the conclusion if someone
> >>    sets a classifier for the execution of a plugin...it would be useful
> >>    to check the validity of the classifier...
> >>
> >>    Based on that i started to search but unfortunately i didn't found a
> >>    definition etc. documentation how a valid classifier looks like or
> >>    the inverse what it does not allowed to be..
> >>
> >>    So does someone know of any kind of definition how a valid
> >>    classifier looks like? Some kind of reference ?
> >>
> >>    Kind regards
> >>    Karl Heinz Marbaise
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> --
Sent from my phone

Reply via email to