Ok as release manager I am cancelling this vote. I’ll see about spinning 3.5.2
On Thu 12 Oct 2017 at 02:51, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017, 23:47:54 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit : > > I think the conclusion is: 3.5.1 is not correct > > > > it should either be: > > 3.5.2 without the 2 classloader related issues. > ideally with an option to activate the classloader changes (for people > knowing > what they are doing or wanting to test mode more widely) > > > or > > 3.6.0 including the classloader related issues, but probably improved > with > > a system property to switch back to the 3.5.0-behavior. We also need to > > improve ITs and documentation. > > > > Since we need to make a new release anyway I would like to suggest to go > > for the first option, because some claim 3.5.0 is corrupt and the related > > issue is already fixed for quite some time. > +1 (sadly) > > Regards, > > Hervé > > > This should give us more time have a better look at these classloader > > issues. > > > > Robert > > > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:46:25 +0200, Stephen Connolly > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I’d really like if somebody could draft the release notes for the two > > > different classloader changes. It will make it easier to decide whether > > > to > > > roll with this or bump minor with (if I recall correctly) the > > > corresponding > > > drop of Java 7 per our policy on JVMs with minor version bump > > > > > > On Wed 11 Oct 2017 at 07:33, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> +1 > > >> eventually adding a flag or system property to activate the new > > >> behaviour > > >> > > >> this remembers me of the idea regarding flags to support new beta > > >> features > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Hervé > > >> > > >> Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017, 08:13:13 CEST Anders Hammar a écrit : > > >> > I'm feeling stronger and stronger about not having this change in a > > >> > > >> bugfix > > >> > > >> > release. Why not go for v3.6.0 if we decide that the class loading > > >> > > >> change > > >> > > >> > is the way to go? And keep bugfix releases for just bugfixes. > > >> > > > >> > /Anders > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY < > [email protected]> > > >> > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > perhaps we should create a Wiki page for > > >> > > >> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException > > >> > > >> > > and > > >> > > list the plugins with known issues and minimum fixed version > > >> > > > > >> > > to be added in > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Errors+and+Solutions > > >> > > >> > > Regards, > > >> > > > > >> > > Hervé > > >> > > > > >> > > Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017, 02:52:53 CEST Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > > >> > > > IIUC, it's MDEPLOY-221 about > > >> > > >> net.flexmojos.oss:flexmojos-maven-plugin > > >> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEPLOY-221 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Regards, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hervé > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Le mardi 10 octobre 2017, 20:48:13 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit : > > >> > > > > FYI, MDEPLOY-121 mentions another plugin being hit by the > > >> > > >> classloader > > >> > > >> > > > > changes. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Robert > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, 03 Oct 2017 20:22:18 +0200, Arnaud Héritier < > > >> > > > > >> > > [email protected]> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > Thanks Stephen > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Stephen Connolly < > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> I am hoping I can find some time to do a final round of > > >> > > >> experiments > > >> > > >> > > and > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> then close the vote with success and publish. > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> On Tue 3 Oct 2017 at 11:13, Arnaud Héritier < > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > > >> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > @Stephen What should we do now ? > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Olivier Lamy < > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> >> Hi > > >> > > > > >> >> Sorry a bit out of time ATM for testing this. > > >> > > > > >> >> Well I trust Arnaud testing that especially if this > > >> > > >> improve > > >> the > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> performance > > >> > > > > >> >> of this very great/awesome/users oriented plugin :P > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> On 13 September 2017 at 22:19, Arnaud Héritier > > >> > > > > >> >> <[email protected]> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> >> > Damned, can't we be anonymous on Github ? > > >> > > > > >> >> > I maintain it is a big word, I'm trying to fix more > bugs > > >> > > >> than > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > I > > >> > > > > >> >> > add > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> new > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > ones > > >> > > > > >> >> > I added Oleg in the loop as he contributed a lot on it > > >> > > >> too > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > I did a quick test to build on Jenkins 2.60.3 our > maven > > >> > > >> core > > >> > > >> > > with > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> the > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> Evil > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > Maven plugin 2.17 on a local SSH agent and it is ok > > >> > > > > >> >> > But it is really a quick test ... > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > Cheers > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Connolly < > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> >> > > On 13 September 2017 at 01:05, Stephen Connolly < > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> On 13 September 2017 at 00:26, Anders Hammar > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> <[email protected]> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> >> > >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly > < > > >> > > > > >> >> > >>> > > >> > > > > >> >> > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> >> > >>> > Have we got any feedback from the embedder > > >> > > >> integrations > > >> > > >> > > yet? > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > >>> I haven't heard anything from the m2e people. > Maybe > > >> > > >> we > > >> > > >> > > need to > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> ping > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > them > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > >>> directly. I can contact Fred Bricon. > > >> > > > > >> >> > >>> > > >> > > > > >> >> > >>> /Anders > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> Please do, also if anyone has a contact in netbeans > > >> > > >> or > > >> > > >> > > intellij > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> and > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > could > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> let them know we'd like either feedback or "we're > ok > > >> > > >> if > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> MNG-6275 > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> makes > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> trouble for us, go ahead and release". I'd like to > > >> > > >> close > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> the > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> vote > > >> > > > > >> on > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > Friday > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> 13:00 UTC. > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > Olivier / Arnaud, have either of you had a chance to > > >> > > >> test > > >> > > >> > > this > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> with > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> the > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > evil project type[1] as you two seem to be the > active > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> maintainers[2] > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > [1]: > > >> https://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2013/11/jenkins-> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > maven-job-type-considered-evil.html [2]: > > >> https://github.com/jenkinsci/maven-plugin/commits/master > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > -- > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > Arnaud > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> -- > > >> > > > > >> >> Olivier Lamy > > >> > > > > >> >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > >> > > > > >> > ----- > > >> > > > > >> > Arnaud Héritier > > >> > > > > >> > http://aheritier.net > > >> > > > > >> > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com > > >> > > > > >> > Twitter/Skype : aheritier > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> -- > > >> > > > > >> Sent from my phone > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > >> -- > > > > > > Sent from my phone > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Sent from my phone
