[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1943?page=comments#action_55192 ]
John Allen commented on MNG-1943:
---------------------------------
Brett,
re 'a rare case', obviously my familiarity with these internal APIs and there
usage is greatly limited so I will defer to your expertese but in general I
would have thought that if someone is using an accessor to retreive a value
they will want the cooked version of that 'property' and not an internal/meta
representation of it, after all what use is ${foo.bar} to the developer who has
called getUrl()?
I'll keep a keen eye out for your MSITE-71 code as I have a number of plugins
that i've had to make reactor dependent in order to gain access to properly
interpolated parent model data.
re 'integration tests' - yep, thats exactly what i meant :)
> MavenProject::getParent() returns a MavenProject that is NOT interpolated
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-1943
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1943
> Project: Maven 2
> Type: Bug
> Reporter: John Allen
> Priority: Blocker
>
>
> Plugin developers repeatedly use ${project}.getParent().someMethod() yet
> getParent() returns a project that has not been interpolated. This obviously
> needs to be fixed but may I also suggest that all plugin acceptance testing
> is revisted to ensure that the tests use POMs that are littered with property
> expressions and not literals.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
