[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPMD-4?page=comments#action_55248 ]
mike perham commented on MPMD-4:
--------------------------------
I have submitted MPMD-2 and it allows you to configure the rulesets used by PMD.
<reporting>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-pmd-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<rulesets>
<ruleset>basic</ruleset>
<ruleset>controversial</ruleset>
</rulesets>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</reporting>
where the two rulesets are assumed to reside in the PMD standard location on
the classpath: /rulesets/[name].xml. Is this flexible enough to close this
issue?
> PMD should use "sensible" default rulesets
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MPMD-4
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPMD-4
> Project: Maven 2.x Pmd Plugin
> Type: Task
> Reporter: Dave Sag
> Attachments: Locator.java, MNG-1158-maven-pmd-plugin.patch,
> PmdReport.java.diff
>
>
> When I add a PMD report to my pom.xml the PMD report claims that my class
> 'Address' should have a constructor.
> this is crazy talk - Address.java is an interface class.
> i guess this is really a PMD bug but i find it hard to believe that such a
> well established tool as PMD would still be throwing up bugs like this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
