Ok, I understand now what you mean by relocate. We should put the relocation info in the POM, but still retain the JAR in both locations.
- Brett Carlos Sanchez wrote: > On 1/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> A problem is that we'll be publishing things like log4j 1.1-dev, >>> probably we should relocate this to log4j-1.1-2005.... to keep it >>> consistent. m1 would still get the 1.1-dev but m2 will get the >>> snapshot and a warning if somebody tries to use it. >> I don't think so. The Maven 1.x repository basically doesn't exist (its >> not web accessible). They are identical. >> > > > yep, but m1 won't follow pom relocations > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
