[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-61?page=comments#action_56429 ]
Dan Tran commented on MASSEMBLY-61: ----------------------------------- why dont we just remove it completely? What is the point of giving user 2 options to name the classifier in the descriptor? 1. descriptor id 2. classifier isn't that redundant? > Should remove/deprecate AbstractUnpackAssembly's classifier field > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MASSEMBLY-61 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-61 > Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin > Type: Improvement > Versions: 2.1 > Environment: xp > Reporter: Dan Tran > Fix For: 2.1 > > > Before the changes of supporting multiple descriptors, we use classifier to > allow user to override the default > descriptor's id as classifier. Now it is no longer valid unless we introduce > multitple classifier fields with match of number of descriptors > WDYT? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
