[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: brett
Date: Mon Jun 26 21:17:46 2006
New Revision: 417335
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=417335&view=rev
Log:
make activation more consistent
Modified:
maven/plugins/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: maven/plugins/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/trunk/pom.xml?rev=417335&r1=417334&r2=417335&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- maven/plugins/trunk/pom.xml (original)
+++ maven/plugins/trunk/pom.xml Mon Jun 26 21:17:46 2006
@@ -80,7 +80,13 @@
</reporting>
<profiles>
<profile>
- <id>ci</id>
+ <id>ciProfile</id>
+ <activation>
+ <property>
+ <name>enableCiProfile</name>
+ <value>true</value>
+ </property>
+ </activation>
I don't get this. Why not just call the profile "ci" or "ciProfile" and
just activate it with -Pci? What's the point in using the system
property to enable it?
Continuum should probably natively support the concept of profiles and
enable them per build configuration, which makes system property-based
profiles a bit harder.
--
Trygve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
