On 04/09/2006, at 8:47 PM, Max Bowsher wrote:
What is the canonical description of the difference between
baseVersion and version?
baseVersion = 1.0-SNAPSHOT. version = 1.0-20060809.141516-1 (under
uniqueVersion) or 1.0-SNAPSHOT (non-uniqueVersion, or locally
installed). Similarly, for non-snapshots, baseVersion = version.
Does this code chunk ever get used in cases other than when
baseVersion contains "SNAPSHOT" and version contains a timestamped
version?
No, because this sentence is exactly the first line of code written
in English :)
Is there a good reason for setting the artifact's file to the
baseVersion generated name, instead of the version generated name?
What is the purpose of making the copy - couldn't everything use
the name of the file already existing?
To be honest, I can't remember and would need to look more closely at
the code whether it is required.
Is it deliberate that at the end of this block, the artifact's
baseVersion has been set to its version?
I think that's a bug, I've seen directories with the timestamp turn
up in the local repository and was wondering where that came from.
Thanks in advance to anyone who has the patience to answer - I
realize that's a rather large list of questions.
--
Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.mxtelecom.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
