Anything is up for discussion, of course...but I just wanted to mention that
changing the syntax of the POM will have to wait until Maven 2.1 at the
soonest.
Sorry to rain on the parade.
-j
On 10/24/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Can we have an element like:
<ciManagement>
<notifiers>
<notifier>
<grouped>true</grouped>
in the pom.xml where the notifiers are being setup defaulting it to
'false' if none is defined. A value of 'true' implies the notifier is a
ProjectGroup notifier and all child modules inherit it, 'false' that the
notifier is project level - or vice versa, whatever makes more sense.
The motivation is to control the level of notifiers and also let
Continuum to work it out if none was defined.
Jesse - I know we talked about zero-config and more control - this
should address both, I think :-)
Cheers,
Rahul
Jesse McConnell wrote:
> I have been working at this problem off and on for a few days and have
> a bit of a stumbling block I would like a bit of feedback on.. build
> definitions where easier for this since they had no equivalent POM
> linkage...but thats a bit of an issue with the notifiers I am finding.
>
> My original assumption was that any notifiers declared in the pom that
> I am loading in as an m2 project would be initialized as a group
> notifier. This becomes a minor issue as the way things stand right
> now I'll have to pass annoying groupPom boolean status into parts of
> the loading mechanism that I really don't want to. But then I just
> got to thinking that this only addresses it part way. Basically I
> wanted to ask if people were comfortable with the following statement.
>
> notifiers defined in the pom being loaded in as the project group pom
> ( the one input into the Add M2 Project page) and the notifiers
> defined in the parents of that pom are all group lvl notifiers. any
> notifiers defined below that point will be attached as individual
> project notifiers. In the case of notifiers configured in poms that
> are the parents of sub-modules/projects (but are still children of the
> top lvl continuum project group pom) will be added to each of the
> child poms below that.
>
> an example might help
>
> P1 -> P2
> P2 -> P3
> P2 -> P4
> P4 -> P5
> P4 -> P6
>
> for P1-6, if P2 where the pom loaded into continuum as the project
> group, then
>
> * notifiers in P1 and P2 are group notifiers
> * notifiers in P4 are added to P4,5,6 as project notifiers
>
> Would this work as a hard and fast rule for notifiers?
>
> jesse
>
