Good day to you, Graham, As of the current source, siteDirectory simply indicates the location of the site files (apt, fml, etc). But still, the site descriptor must still be src/site/site.xml (or src/site/site_<encoding>.xml).
I am not actually sure why MSITE-91 was closed either. Can anyone reopen MSITE-91 so that I can submit a patch for the current source? The patch will allow users to specify their site directory (directory containing the apts, fmls, xdcos, and site descriptor files) ? Thanks, Franz I've just taken a look at MSITE-91 and I also do not understand why it was On 11/13/06, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, November 13, 2006 7:57 pm, Graham Leggett wrote: > First question: does the siteDirectory parameter specify the location of > the site.xml file, in addition to the apt, fml and xdoc directories, or am > I barking up the wrong tree? I found MSITE-91, which has a comment from May this year to say that siteDirectory is still broken. Can anyone confirm whether siteDirectory is broken, or whether I am doing something wrong? Regards, Graham -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
