Rahul Thakur wrote:
'int' ids are now converted to 'long' across the project and to allow
really large values. This should cater to scenarios where the id
generation could be started from an arbitrary large value.
Won't this break the API?
Yep, it would.
What is the use case where 4 billion IDs isn't sufficient?
2 billion you mean :-). But this also more of something that I have
noticed 'traditionally' that ids are specified as long and stored as
bigints in database
No, 4 billion. an int is +-2billion. Anyway, just because longs are more
traditionally used that is not a good enough reason to switch to longs
and break the API to me.
--
Trygve
- Re: [vote] merge id-refactor branch changes Trygve Laugstøl
-